Sex education for five year olds?

sexedu 210215

The Education Select Committee has demanded that SRE is placed on the national curriculum, though parents would still be able to withdraw their children from lessons.

The latest government advice on sex and relationships education (SRE) is 14 years old and the Education Select Committee heard evidence during its inquiry that life has changed radically since then, with the rise of social media, cyberbullying and easy access to pornography. Now the committee has published a hard-hitting report that criticises the government’s “weak” strategy for improving SRE and calls for it to become part of the national curriculum for the first time, the Telegraph reports.

The MPs were concerned about the lack of clarity over the status of sex education in schools. Primary schools only have to provide SRE in the science curriculum; academies do not have to offer the subject and council-run secondaries have to cover sexually transmitted diseases as part of science for 14 to 16 year-olds.

The MPs are urging the DfE to come up with a strategy to deliver age-appropriate personal, social, health education (PSHE) and SRE in all schools, with enough curriculum time and specialist training for teachers. Graham Stuart, chairman of the committee, said there was an “overwhelming demand” for statutory SRE from teachers, parents and young people. “It’s important that school leaders and governors take PSHE seriously and improve their provision, by investing in training and putting PSHE lessons on the school timetable. Statutory status will help ensure all of this happens,” he said. “Young people have a right to information that will keep them healthy and safe.”

However, the committee says that parents should retain the right to remove their children from sex education. “Parents have rights too. They must be consulted by schools on the provision of SRE and must keep the right to withdraw their children if they are unhappy with what the school provides,” Mr. Stuart said. NASUWT questioned this, commenting: “Policymakers need to decide whether SRE is statutory and is treated as such in all schools, in which case parental opt-out cannot be retained. If curriculum freedom for academies and parental opt-out are to be retained then quite clearly PSHE and SRE are not statutory and no one should pretend otherwise.”

Do you think sex education should be part of the national curriculum? Share your views with the Eteach community!

3 thoughts on “Sex education for five year olds?

  1. I do not think it should be put on the curriculum for five to six year old pupils especially in faith schools. The young pupils will not understand it and will therefore lead to confusion.

  2. As a primary teacher, I wouldn’ t want to teach sex education ,as a parent of a six year old, I would demand to withdraw my son from such lessons.
    I wen t to a faith school myself a s a child, we never had such talks, my mum spoke to me about girls body changes and periods etc when the time came. That’s it. I had my first child at 36! So teenage pregnancy is due to poor parenting and lack so self respect , not a lack of sex education. A teacher is no substitute for a parent.

  3. I don’t think sex education should be part of school curriculum especially in the primary school.\parents are the best people to decide when their children are ready to learn about such a complex part of life. What about the rights of children? Do they want to know what sex education at this tender age?Are children at this tender age psychologically ready? There are too many questions that we really need to think seriously think about before we provide sex education at this age.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>